Section
11 Overview
Financial
Analysis of the Costs to Implement the Preferred Alternative
to Improve Senior Transportation in Cuyahoga County
Projected costs are
broken into categories, as follows:• Costs incurred
in the initial implementation period, prior to the
initiation of actual senior transportation
services.
• On-going administrative costs incurred
by the STO.
• On-going administrative, operations, and maintenance
costs incurred by the DSP in each CTA.
• Capital costs for both start-up and to support on-going
operations.
To meet all projected demand (e.g.,
provide 1.26 million annual trips), new funding ranging
from $2.8 million
in Year 2 to $10.5 million after full implementation
in all five CTAs in Year 4 must be found to augment
existing funding sources
Based on review of the financial
forecasts by the Senior Transportation Working Group,
a service model
wherein
the STO would increase service by 50 percent over
current levels was adopted. In this scenario, the
level of
trips provided by the regional providers would
total about 573,750 passenger trips per year (45.6 of total
projected demand). New funding ranging from $1.25
million in Year 2 to $3.46 million after full implementation
in all five CTAs in Year 4 must be found to augment
existing funding sources.
All 168 existing vehicles
owned by public entities and nonprofit organizations
were assumed to be
included in the strategic plan’s implementation
phase. Additionally, the 11 vehicles operated
by various hospitals
were also included, for a total existing fleet
of 179 vehicles.
A fifty percent increase over
current service levels can be accomplished
with this fleet, reflecting
the benefits and expanded productivity associated
with
centralized fleet management. The fleet can
be sustained (e.g., regular replacements) with an
annual investment
of $1.28 million dollars.
> download
section 11 in pdf format
|
|
Assumptions
Used in the Development of the Financial Analysis
Demographics
in the Proposed Regions
Projected Transportation Needs, by
Region
Service Level Assumptions
Projections of Cost to Implement the Preferred Alternative
Projected Cost
Review of the Financial Analysis by the Senior Transportation
Working Group
Recommended Financial Program |